Home > Risk > Is your organization more agile than the Titanic?

Is your organization more agile than the Titanic?

What would it have taken for management of the Oceanic Steam Navigation Company, who owned the Titanic, to have avoided the loss of this magnificent vessel?

  1. An appreciation of the need for risk management before and during the voyage
  2. The ability to recognize hazards, such as icebergs, in its path – and to do so early, not at the last minute
  3. The intelligence to assess and evaluate them as dangerous, with a need to take actions to avoid a disaster
  4. The ability to avoid the iceberg. If there is sufficient notice (see #1), the ship has to be sufficiently agile (maneuverable)  to either change direction to go around the iceberg or stop before getting to it
  5. Preparation and training, so that all of the above can be applied effectively and without delay

Is your organization more agile than the Titanic turned out to be?

  1. Does it recognize, not only with words but with actions, that risk management is critical to the achievement of organizational objectives?
  2. Does this belief extend from the board down to every decision-maker, so business decisions are made with the information necessary to be successful?
  3. Are there measures to ensure that every decision-maker has sufficient guidance to know which risks he/she should take? Risk management is not about avoiding risks: it’s about knowing how to take the right risks
  4. Do decision-makers have sufficient risk-related information to make informed decisions? Is the information current, timely, reliable, and in a useful condition?
  5. Can your organization move quickly and with agility when new risks appear, risk levels change, or opportunities scream for your attention? Or are your process, culture, organization, and systems going to keep your feet mired in molasses? Is your organization as slow as a leviathan like the Titanic, or nimble like a frigate?
About these ads
  1. ARNOLD SCHANFIELD
    April 20, 2012 at 11:33 AM

    there was poor judgment and tone at the top issues. They had only 16 lifeboats and needed 48- the owner of the line or the captain made the decision that the boat could not afford the expense of the other 32

    they refused as well to take advice from a neighboring ship when they were getting close to the iceberg area

    they allowed first class passengers to row away from the ship in lifeboats that were two thirds empty causing many more deaths- 1500 deaths and 700 lives saved

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,303 other followers

%d bloggers like this: