Home > Risk > GRC – an academic definition of the word “mess”

GRC – an academic definition of the word “mess”

February 2, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

I want to commend an article in CFO magazine to you: it can be downloaded at http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14470743?f=search.

The article leads with this:

“The software category known as “governance, risk, and compliance” ended 2009 pretty much where it began: still lacking a clear identity. Any apt description of GRC, in fact, remains tantamount to, as one industry insider puts it, “an academic definition of the word mess.”

“It is an open question whether the GRC umbrella — stretching over at least 20 substantially different “enterprise platforms” plus an immense array of more-focused products that address specific facets of GRC (often tailored for a specific industry’s needs) — has any definition at all. ‘There’s no arguing that from a buyer’s perspective, ‘GRC software’ doesn’t exist today,’ Ventana Research analyst Robert Kugel wrote recently.”

No, I didn’t write or contribute to the piece – but I agree with much of what it has to say. Do you?

  1. John Fraser
    November 9, 2015 at 7:47 AM

    I just Googled GRC academic research and found nothing…..

  1. March 8, 2011 at 9:34 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: