Home > Risk > Balancing reputation risk and the ability to manage cost

Balancing reputation risk and the ability to manage cost

September 22, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

Two articles in the Financial Times about BP shed light on the need to consider reputation risk when you are designing your process for managing cost. If you are too focused on limiting cost, or over-relying on a contractor, you may be more at risk than you think.

The first article talks about how the company’s apparent practice of insisting on their rights under the law to control payment of claims has resulted in further damage to their reputation – this time increasing their reputation for insensitivity to the community and the people damaged in the spill.

The second piece talks about how BP failed to provide effective oversight of their contractors. This is interesting, because it points out the risks in outsourcing functions and controls to a partner. You can outsource the process, but not the accountability. If and when there is a failure, you are not immune from the fallout.

How well does your company monitor your partner’s activities? Are you at risk (whether compliance-related risk or reputation risk) if they fail to perform to your expectations?

  1. October 9, 2010 at 7:43 AM

    A nice thank you letter

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: