A Leap Forward for Risk and Compliance
Last week, I had the honor of being the opening keynote speaker at the Compliance Week West conference in Palo Alto. As we gathered, I chatted with a couple of friends from a large technology company. They told me about some amazing things they are doing with the latest technology (including from SAP and its partners) to improve their risk and compliance activities. This company is not alone and I am hearing stories from companies in all different sectors and geographies almost every week.
- One company is continuously monitoring hundreds of millions of transactions for indicators (red flags) of potential fraud. While organizations have been doing this on a monthly basis for a long time, the latest in-memory technology provides speed improvements – up to 300,000 times faster than just a year ago – that let them monitor transactions almost as they are processed. Now, they can intervene and take action quickly and close down anything improper very quickly.
- A large bank is using some of the same in-memory technology to monitor signs of money-laundering. With the massive fines being levied by the government and regulators for anti-money laundering (AML) compliance failures, this has become a critical activity for financial services organizations. The power is now available to monitor the literally billions of transactions processed every day.
- An IT organization has moved its information security threat risk assessment tool onto an in-memory platform. Previously, the tool was limited to assessing intrusion risks by analyzing a sample of intrusion attempts. As a result, its accuracy and reliability was limited. Now, it does its assessment based on the full history of intrusion attempts.
- SAP is one of many companies that use social media monitoring technology (sometimes referred to as sentiment analytics or text analytics) to monitor what people are saying about the company; this keeps their fingers on reputation risk.
- SAP’s internal risk management function is in the process of deploying mobile risk analytics. Linked to our enterprise risk management system, this mobile app will enable every manager to see and dive into the risks they own. It is enabling risk management to be “embedded” into daily management of the business.
- Other companies are using new technology to improve their monitoring and communication of risks across the organization. It is great to go to a conference, such as Compliance Week West, and see the growing maturity of risk and compliance solutions showcased by vendors, some with integrated risk monitoring capabilities.
The ability to monitor risk and compliance in a more dynamic fashion that is responsive to change delivers power and value to the organization – and to the contribution that can be made by risk and compliance professionals.
But, I hear you say, risk and compliance functions don’t have the money to spend on expensive new toys.
That is true, but the majority of companies are either acquiring or actively looking at the new technology to improve business operations – especially to leverage so-called Big Data, but also to improve the analytics used to make decisions and run the business.
Risk and compliance professionals should be looking for the opportunity to leverage the technology their organization is acquiring for other purposes. That is what my friends at the Silicon Valley technology giant did.
What to look for? Here’s a partial list of new technology to power risk and compliance:
- In-memory computing (sometimes this is called in-memory analytics, sometimes just as a platform or a database. SAP’s solution is called HANA)
- Predictive analytics
- Mobile analytics (sometimes referred to as mobile business intelligence, or mobile BI)
- Risk monitoring, including event monitoring (where a real-time agent tests individual transactions against rules as they are processed)
- And more, such as these solutions from Wipro
I would love to hear what you are doing with the new technology to improve risk and compliance effectiveness and efficiency.
Recent Posts on this Blog
- Is a new maturity model for GRC the right model? September 25, 2016
- The Wells Fargo “Staff Scam”: More questions and fewer answers September 16, 2016
- The astonishing Wells Fargo fraud September 10, 2016
- Leading an effective information security capability September 4, 2016
- Have your provided comments on the COSO ERM draft? August 31, 2016
- How to do your internal audit risk assessment August 27, 2016
- Do techies really understand cyber risk? August 20, 2016
- Continuing to learn about culture from Toyota August 13, 2016
- The danger of an arrogant board August 7, 2016
- The Board and Technology: Questions to ask the management team July 31, 2016
- IIA Insights on Internal Audit Effectiveness July 22, 2016
- Deloitte predicts change for Internal Audit July 20, 2016
- Risk and Opportunity Management July 2, 2016
- Risk reporting to the Board June 26, 2016
- We need to review and provide feedback on the COSO ERM Exposure Draft June 19, 2016
- Reconsidering the Board: Its Composition and Oversight of Management September 19, 2016
- Time for the Board to Take a Deep Dive Into Risk Management and Risks September 12, 2016
- Oversight of the External Auditor September 6, 2016
- Signs of a Failing Board August 29, 2016
- Contrasting Comments on Internal Audit From a CAE and a Consultant August 23, 2016
- Asking the Tough Questions About Internal Audit August 15, 2016
- When Risk Management Fails August 8, 2016
- An Internal Audit Ambition Model August 1, 2016
- Understanding and Assessing Governance Risk July 25, 2016
- Internal Audit, Risk Management, and Technology July 19, 2016