Home > Risk > The future of internal auditing

The future of internal auditing

January 26, 2021 Leave a comment Go to comments

Bruce Turner, “an active company director and audit committee chair”, was recently interviewed on this topic. You can see the full interview at CERM Risk Insights and there is also an article in Future of Professions.

The second of these, the article, has some interesting observations that I will let you read at your leisure.

When Bruce is asked about how the profession of internal auditing should change, he makes some points worth repeating here:

There are three fundamentals to internal auditors adapting to the changes confronting them – demonstrate impact; embrace technology; and apply a balanced approach.

Auditors will need to continuously demonstrate the value of their work if they are to receive sufficient and sustained funding. They will need to work more efficiently while operating in unpredictable conditions, and it will be imperative to leverage technology to compensate for the likely loss of people within their audit teams. Auditors need a balanced approach, whereby audit technology is used wisely and strategically, and blended with physical interactions with clients to witness organizational culture and operational practices firsthand.

Bruce was asked additional questions that are reported in the CERM piece. One relates to that point in the article about the use of technology.

The question was:

In an article I wrote recently, I envisioned increasingly powerful computing capability and AI-driven screening taking over the preponderance of audit tasks by passing all transactions through the screening process rather than relying on after-the-fact statistical sampling of only some of them.  Is this reasonable?

Bruce’s answer was:

Yes, it is reasonable in organizations that have a strong digital platform. However, there are some global regions where this will be quite some years off. Where internal auditors do have the opportunity to leverage powerful computing capability I would rather see this being used to enhance the value proposition of internal audit (i.e. to help internal auditors boost their value and productivity, without the need to slash internal audit resourcing per se).

I disagree both with the premise of the question and the answer.

I much prefer internal audit to confirm that management has the controls in place to ensure the integrity of data rather than attempting to do it themselves.

The technology being discussed makes excellent detective controls performed by management. Internal audit can help by working with management to deploy these tools for advantage rather than use them themselves.

There are five useful takeaways in the CERM piece. This one resonates strongly with me:

Governance, risk management, compliance, assurance and audit professionals need to be innovative in what they do and how they do it to evolve from a hindsight perspective where they traditionally reported on the past, to delivering insights that help business managers now, and ultimately, they need to share foresight that helps business managers run the business in the future.

Having said that, what do I foresee in the future of internal auditing?

  • A continuation of the trend to flexible and agile auditing that focuses on what matters to the success of the organization now and in the future.
  • The obsolescence of the annual audit plan and its replacement by a continuously updated or rolling plan.
  • A focus on communicating the information that leaders need, when they need it, in a readily consumable form rather than a formal audit report.
  • The elimination of traffic lights to rank issues in favor of an approach that explains why they matter.
  • New attention to the quality of decision-making processes!

That last may not be the final frontier, but it is a fascinating one.

What do you think?

The final frontier

  1. Anonymous
    January 26, 2021 at 5:05 PM

    Well said, Norman! Thanks for your valuable input today!

  2. Mark Williams
    January 27, 2021 at 12:01 AM

    I do like your vision for the future of internal auditing. I think you’ve missed one off the list from an efficiency, quality and engagement perspective. It’s “real” audit delivery Teams:

    Stable (keeping them intact for the whole audit) and focused (same one or two audits, reducing context switching).

    Audit leadership need to help build and then respect them (ie. keep them intact as best they can). I’ve yet to see an IA department that does not play “Resource Tetris” with their people and that does not ignore Brooks’ law (adding people to a late project only makes it later). The culprit driving these behaviours: optimizing to hit a delivery plan, rather than optimising for value or impact & influence of our audits. There’s so much to this, but the benefits are significant.

  3. January 27, 2021 at 7:02 AM

    I think your last point about decision-making is vital and should be included in any audit – I have updated my book to include it.
    Virtually every job involves some sort of decision-making from, ‘Do I pay this invoice?’ to ‘Should we buy this company?’. Ideally, in both cases there should be clear guidelines as to who can make the decision and within what rules. Thus there should be guidelines and rules in existence plus training in how to apply them. So that’s a start for auditors.
    David
    http://www.internalaudit.biz

  1. January 26, 2021 at 10:50 PM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: